January dates of note (Review 5 January 2019)
- 1 Centenary of birth of The Catcher in the Rye Author JD Salinger*.
- 7 Winners of Costa category awards announced.
- 11 Release of the biopic Collette, starring Kiera Knightley.
- 12 50th Anniversary of the publication of Phillip Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint.
- 14 TS Eliot prize for poetry awarded.
- 29 Costa prize-giving with book of the year revealed.
- Germaine Greer turns 80.
In this post I will be pondering upon 14th January: The TS Eliot prize award for poetry.
Image: TS Eliot by Lady Ottoline Morrell © The estate of Lady Ottoline Morrell. Creative Commons Non-Commercial Licence
I mentioned in my first post that some of the dates are written as if self-explanatory – that anyone would understand why these, rather than other dates, are especially of note in the literary year ahead. In a future post, I will reflect on the influence of the lens upon the collection offered.
I chose this date because I am relatively ignorant about the event. What I know about the craft of poetry writing could be covered in a seven-line limerick. Beyond ‘knowing what I like’ in a poem (John Cooper Clarke, Maya Angelou, Roger McGough, – popular but arguably unadventurously mainstream) I find many as difficult to interpret as another language. Learning about the shortlist and the winner provides me with an opportunity to give more time to poetry than I usually allow.
Helpfully, readings from the full shortlist are posted online:
Personally, I find hearing poetry is a more satisfactory, more sensual experience than reading it and so I spent a couple of hours being variously caressed, battered or bored.
I do not have the technical knowledge to critique but I found Tracy K Smith’s reading from Wade in the Water (Penguin, 2018) to be distinctive, evocative and politically thought-provoking.
The winner of the TS Eliot prize was announced as Hannah Sullivan for her book Three Poems (Faber, 2018). Her work is precise with a near-forensic economy of chosen words. Her reading readily evoked visceral imagery. Belying my lack of a framework to understand poetic form and discipline, I did not have as powerful a response to it as the prize awarding panel which found her work ‘exhilarating’. The Chair of the panel and previous winner Sinéad Morrissey is reported, in a Guardian article, to have said of Ms Sullivan that ‘a star is born’.
A quick peruse of Wikipedia shows there are a great many well-respected poetry prize opportunities internationally and I assume this must be a good thing for poets and therefore poetry. It must be a very challenging field in which to publish and become successful. Prizes must help bring work into focus and audience and this can only be a very lovely thing. The TS Eliot prize is unquestionably much coveted and indeed, valuable.
I found an unexpected prize. The TS Eliot Prize website made available for download readers notes for each nominated author. Notes include brief bio’s of the author, example reviews of their work – some samples of which are also included – and, super-usefully, discussion ideas through which to dissect and debate the authors work. Suggestions for other writers of a similar vein are offered. The reader notes allow poetry novices such as me a way to engage with and learn how to understand the poems submitted. It is my intention to now actively use these so go back to the recordings and consider them with a more discerning ear. There was also an invitation to join the mailing list and I enthusiastically signed up.
If one is a poet or involved personally/professionally in the literary world, then I guess the TS Eliot prize is indeed noteworthy and perhaps obviously so. I am sorry (and perhaps just a little bit embarrassed to admit) it had not crossed my own horizon before, but I am very sure it will become a date to note for me in the future. I am grateful it was included in the list.
Postscript: *I note that the Review of 2 February 2019 carries a four-page article based on an interview with Matt Salinger, JD Salinger’s son and literary executor. On 3rd February the Observer (sister paper) ran a ‘book of the day’ article by Tim Adams (@TimAdamsWrites) about the publication of volume 8 of the letters of TS Eliot. I wonder if perhaps the Literary Review calendar is in fact plan which will be guiding future editions of the supplement? Time will tell.